Air may be dehumidified by (1) cooling it or increasing its pressure, reducing its capacity to hold
moisture, or (2) removing moisture by attracting the water vapor with a liquid or solid desiccant.
Frequently, systems use a combination of these methods to maximize operating efficiency and minimize
installed cost.
Liquid desiccant conditioners (absorbers) contact the air with a liquid desiccant, such as a solution
of lithium chloride or glycol (Figures
2A, 2B,
and 3),
to dehumidify and often cool that air. When the water vapor pressure of such a solution is lower
than the partial pressure of water in the surrounding air, the solution will collect moisture,
thereby decreasing its concentration and dehumidifying the air. The solution’s water vapor
pressure is a function of its temperature and concentration. Solutions of higher desiccant
concentration and/or lower temperature result in lower water vapor pressures and have a stronger
dehumidifying effect on the contacted air.
Conversely, liquid desiccant regenerators also contact the air with the same liquid desiccant. When
the water vapor pressure of such a solution is higher than the partial pressure of water in the
surrounding air, the solution will reject moisture, thereby increasing its concentration and
humidifying the air. Solutions of lower desiccant concentration and/or higher temperature result in
higher water vapor pressures and have a humidifying effect on the contacted air.
A simple way to show this relationship is to graph the humidity ratio of air in equilibrium with a
liquid desiccant as a function of its concentration and temperature. Figure
4 presents this relationship for lithium chloride/water solutions in equilibrium with air at
101.325 kPa. The graph has the same general shape as a psychrometric chart, with the
relative humidity lines replaced by desiccant concentration lines.
To dehumidify air, a first airstream (either outdoor, return, or mixed air) contacts a cooled
solution in the conditioner; water condenses into the desiccant solution from the air, and the
solution is diluted. The diluted solution is continuously reconcentrated in the regenerator, where
it is heated to elevate its water vapor pressure and equilibrium humidity ratio. A second airstream,
usually outdoor air, contacts the heated solution in the regenerator; water evaporates from the
desiccant solution into the air, and the solution is reconcentrated. Desiccant solution is
continuously circulated between the conditioner and regenerator to complete the cycle. Liquid
desiccant conditioners typically have high contact efficiency, so air leaves the conditioner at a
temperature and humidity ratio very close to the entering temperature and equilibrium humidity ratio
of the desiccant.
Liquid desiccants are typically very effective antifreeze. As a result, liquid-desiccant heat pumps
can continuously deliver air at subfreezing temperatures without frosting or freezing problems.
Lithium chloride/water solution, for example, has a eutectic point below
–68°C; liquid desiccant conditioners using this solution can cool air to
temperatures as low as –45°C.
LiCl is an ionic salt that is widely used as a liquid desiccant. Other options that have been used
include similar salts such as CaCl, which has a more limited operating range but is significantly
cheaper. The properties of these and more novel liquid desiccant options are discussed in more
detail in Chapter 32 of the 2021 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals.
Liquid desiccant (LD) systems circulate the desiccant between a conditioner that supplies the process
air and a regenerator that restores the desiccant concentration by removing the humidity absorbed at
the conditioner from the desiccant. The change in concentration is typically 1 to 3% per
circulation. Absorption and desorption are driven by vapor pressure differences between the air
flowing over the desiccant and the desiccant surface. Effective heat exchangers will therefore have
similar vapor pressures in the air at the conditioner and the regenerator, corresponding to similar
relative humidity levels. Figure
4 shows the equilibrium relative humidity levels for LD at different temperatures and
concentrations, as well as areas where the solution either freezes (concentration <25%,
temperatures <<0°C) or crystalizes in different combinations of LiCl and
H2O crystals. Typical supply conditioner requirements are 50% rh, which requires a
concentration of about 30% LiCL.
LiCl is an effective desiccant and can achieve lower dew-point levels then CaCL and other cheaper
alternatives. Since lithium is now widely used in many applications, in particular batteries,
pricing has responded to the increased demand. Salts like LiCl and CaCL are also corrosive. As a
result, work is being done on other ionic fluids that have less corrosive properties (see Chapter 32 of the 2021 ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals). These tend to have
significantly higher viscosity as well as other differences in properties that require significant
redesign.
To deal with the corrosive nature of the desiccant salts like LiCL, liquid desiccant heat exchangers
(LDHX) using LiCL are made of polymers and covered with membranes that allow humidity to pass but
block the transfer of liquids (i.e., the salt solution).
Internal cooling of the panel is critical. A typical salt solution of 30% can dehumidify air to point
B in Figure
5 adiabatically but to point A if the absorption heat is removed by a heat transfer fluid.
Solid desiccants can typically dehumidify to much lower relative humidity levels, which makes
adiabatic cooling possible. But liquid desiccants typically supply air at 40 to 60% rh, which at
temperatures of 35°C results in dew points of 20°C or higher. They
are typically cooled using a heat transfer fluid (e.g., water or glycol). Direct cooling with a
refrigerant involves pressures that are difficult to handle with noncorrosive materials.
Creating heat exchangers that are internally cooled, with thin layer of desiccant covered on the
outside by a membrane, has been a challenging design task, requiring using advanced manufacturing
techniques. Recent published results (Wood et al. 2022) show performance within 10% of the modeled
theoretical potential of this approach compared to about 50% using earlier solutions.
Figure
5 shows 2003 Conde data comparing theoretical to actual performance for a wide variety of
research programs. Actual performance of liquid desiccant systems generally was a fraction of the
theoretical potential. After 2010, significant improvements were achieved, resulting in low-flow
systems performing close to theoretical performance.
Low-flow systems have a mass flow ratio of desiccant to air of 5 to 20%. This is important for
overall performance because the desiccant needs to be moved between regenerator and conditioner. A
low mass flow ratio reduces the energy losses that occur in that process. The alternative is a
complex desiccant flow management system to increase the delta in concentration between regenerator
and conditioner, which affects system costs.
Regeneration using waste heat of a compressor should be able to make efficient use of this heat
without overheating the condenser. Regeneration tends to be more efficient at higher temperatures,
but those higher temperatures also result in a higher lift and thus lower performance of the
compressor. As a result, optimized systems tend to run at moderate concentrations of 25 to 35% LiCL,
which can be maintained at condenser temperatures of 38 to 49°C, resulting in a
supply air of about 50% rh at 18 to 24°C.
Overall efficiency of compressor-based systems is driven by the fact that they dehumidify to target
dew point at much higher temperatures. Condensing systems cool to the dew point. The difference is
15 to 20% in cooling requirements. By using LDHX, compressor systems can avoid reheat by not
overcooling the air. The condenser is cooled using a combination of evaporation and sensible
cooling, which reduces fan power requirements and reduces overall lift at high load operating
conditions. In heat pump mode, systems avoid the need for defrost cycles, which improves heating
efficiency and increases the temperature range at which the heat pump can operate efficiently. LDHX
can also maintain 30 to 50% rh in the space using humidity available outdoors.
Of course, where waste heat is easily available from fuels cells, cogeneration and other waste heat
sources, regeneration can be done at higher temperatures. With such waste heat, systems can
dehumidify air to 7 to 13°C using cooling tower water at 18 to
24°C. This makes it possible to use evaporative cooling systems in humid climates as
well as in desert conditions with very high wet-bulb conditions (see Figure 8).
The cool air from the conditioner and the hot air from the regenerator have approximately the same
relative humidity, since the changes in desiccant concentration are within 1 to 2%. Figure 6 shows the conditions for
lithium chloride where the vapor pressure in the desiccant at a certain concentration balances with
a specific concentration. The psychrometric chart shows vertical lines of constant dry-bulb
temperature, horizontal lines of constant absolute humidity expressed either in the dew-point
temperature, ratio of the mass of the water in the air versus the total
mass of the air. The angled lines show constant enthalpy of the air. The lines of
constant relative humidity and those for the vapor pressure of the desiccant at a constant
concentration are parallel. A concentration of LiCl of 20 to 30% corresponds to a relative humidity
of 60 to 40% at 18 to 24°C. Those are target conditions that have shown to be in
the health and comfort zone of the psychrometric chart.
Liquid desiccant performance compared to standard DX system is shown in Figure 7. At outdoor air condition
A, the liquid desiccant will supply air at condition B and regenerate at condition C. In
equilibrium, the moisture removed from the conditioned air needs to be released in the regeneration
air. The relative humidity of the supply air and of the regenerator air are similar since they both
use the same circulating liquid desiccant. Qevap is the work
that the compressor has to do to cool and dehumidify the air from A to B. Qevap plus the waste energy from the compressor I2R is the energy available for regeneration. The temperature
difference between the evaporator and condenser is typically 22 to 28 K. Unlike typical
DX systems, condenser airflows tend to comparable or much smaller than evaporator airflows.
Effective regeneration at 50% rh requires a temperature over 38°C, with most of the
energy dissipated through evaporation. At low loads and cool very humid outside air conditions,
regeneration is most effective with low airflows at similar temperatures of 38 to
49°C.
A traditional DX system (dotted lines) needs to cool the air to dew point and needs to do more about
15% more work to cool the air to the target dew point at 100% rh. Condenser airflows tend to be
several times larger than airflows at the evaporator and total lift is typically has a larger lift
of 33 to 38 K. High capacity condensing coils tend to be deep with high pressure drop,
resulting in high fan loads for both conditioner and regenerator.
Figure 8 shows a typical layout
of a liquid desiccant system with membrane enabled three-way heat exchangers. It shows the
conditioner and regenerator with the liquid desiccant flowing through a heat exchanger. As the
liquid desiccant circulates between the cold conditioner and a hot regenerator, the heat exchanger
is essential to minimize the heat loss of this circulation. The heat transfer fluid, which can be
water, glycol or other high-heat-capacity fluids, is cooled and heated in the evaporator and
condenser HX of a compressor. This makes the unit a drop-in replacement for existing DX systems.
The liquid desiccant concentration can be varied by changing the airflow through the regenerator.
When more control is needed, air-cooled coils can be added. They reduce or increase the available
heat for regeneration. The HDC or heat dump coil rejects compressor heat, reducing the regenerator
temperature and thereby lowing the concentration of the desiccant, which increases the relative
humidity of the supply air and the SHR of the system.
For humid and cool conditions, a second heat recovery coil (HRC) can be used. This coil cools down
the regen air providing additional load for the compressor which allows the regenerator to increase
the desiccant concentration. This allows for adiabatic or near adiabatic dehumidification of the
conditioned supply air.
Where relative dry exhaust air is available the heat requirements of the regenerator is reduced. This
increases system efficiency by 10 to 20% especially during humid and cool conditions.
The system can be used as a heat pump by changing the heat transfer fluid flow, so that the fluid
going into the conditioner is heated, while the regenerator dehumidifies and cools the outside air.
Alternatively, the refrigerant flow in the compressor can be switched. The cold outside air at the
regenerator is dehumidified and cooled. As a result, frost forming and thus frost cycles can be
avoided.
The efficiency of the system shown in Figure 8 is improved compared to
traditional DX systems by using smaller compressors, with a smaller lift, doing less work to
dehumidify the air. In addition, or as an alternative for the compressor, other heat and cold
sources can be used. In particular, cooling tower water can be used to manage the dehumidification
load of these liquid desiccant systems, with waste, geothermal, or solar heat used for regeneration.
This further reduces power requirements for cooling and dehumidification. The fit of these
configurations depends on the relative cost and sustainability of electricity versus the
availability and cost of waste heat and evaporative cooling sources.
LiCl is widely used as a desiccant given its favorable characteristics at typical outside air and
supply air conditions. Alternatives like CaCl and potassium can be used, depending on the
application. Because of the corrosive character of the desiccant salts , the heat exchangers are
made of polymers to avoid corrosion. The membrane prevents the desiccant from entering the airstream
while ensuring that the desiccant is spread out across the surface of the heat exchanger. In
addition, mist eliminators can be added if there are concerns about damage to the membranes.
To meet UL 900 requirements the plastic heat exchangers are protected by a low pressure drop fire
protector. This is visible in an early version of a three-way membrane-enabled liquid desiccant heat
exchanger (Figure
9).
Characteristically, liquid desiccant systems are used where there are significant outside air
requirements in humid climates. They perform well when humidity control is important and the system
needs to be able to operate at a low or variable SHR. In climates that combine hot and humid
conditions during part of the year or day, with extremely hot and dry conditions, the desiccant
needs to be diluted to avoid crystallization. This can be done by adding demineralized water
directly to the desiccant solution, or by maintaining a high relative humidity in the regenerator,
the conditioner, or both by humidifying the outside air with a evaporative pad or misting device.
Where other sources of heating and cooling are available, the desiccant heat exchangers can be used
to dehumidify and regenerate the liquid desiccant solution. To maintain the concentration of the
desiccant requires that the available regeneration heat is greater than the cooling energy. When
used as a DOAS system, the performance of liquid desiccant systems is measured in
kg/kW. When overall efficiency is measured the ratio of kilowatts cooling to kilowatts
of power used by the system can be used, measured at the relevant conditions for that system (i.e.,
not necessarily at the conditions described in AHRI Standard 340).
Performance of liquid desiccant systems can be measured in several ways:
-
Liquid desiccant dedicated outside air systems are evaluated based on their performance
against the 920 standard, which measures the system integrated seasonal moisture removal rate
(ISMRE), a measure of energy required to remove humidity.
-
Air handlers using dedicated outdoor air systems can be evaluated using COP or EER, which
evaluate the total energy removed or added to air divided by the system energy required
to do this work. To measure the advantage that LD systems have in removing humidity at
higher operating temperatures, their performance can be best compared to standard
systems that condense outdoor air by using an equivalent EER or COP that compares the
work done by the unit to the work that would be required by a standard unit cooling the
air to the target dew point.
-
Heat exchangers can be evaluated using sensible and latent effectiveness. Latent
effectiveness is typically measured as the actual change in moisture in the air divided
by the delta between the initial moisture level (kg/kg) compared to the
moisture removal potential. Typically this is measured by calculating air moisture at a
temperature equal to that of the incoming cooling/water fluid and at a vapor pressure
equal to that of the liquid desiccant at the concentration entering the heat exchanger.
An alternative measure that gives a better comparison to typical heat exchangers
measures the target condition based on the temperature and concentration of the liquid
desiccant leaving the HX
-
Actual system and module performance can be predicted using a physics-based model (Woods
et al. 2022), with all the physical properties of the unit. A comparison between that
modeled performance and actual performance then shows how close the unit is to the
theoretical optimum predicted by the model, which is a good indicator of the maturity of
the design. As indicated above, this used to be between 30 and 70% of theoretical
performance; however, recent results are much closer at about 90% of theoretical
performance. Such measures are critical for evaluating production results and for
understanding the trade-offs between system size and complexity and actual performance.
In Woods et al. (2022), predicted performance was shown as shown in Figure
10, showing the actual and modeled results for a liquid desiccant system at the
four 920 conditions (1 = 920A, 2 = 920B, etc.). For reference, the minimum ISMRE
requirement for DOAS systems under the 2019 standard is 1.6 kg/kW.