Figure 7 illustrates the principle of operation and arrangement of major components of a typical rotary solid-desiccant dehumidifier. The desiccant can be beads of granular material packed into a bed, or it can be finely divided and impregnated throughout a structured medium. The structured medium resembles corrugated cardboard rolled into a drum, so that air can pass freely through flutes aligned lengthwise through the drum.
In both granular and structured-medium units, the desiccant itself can be either a single material, such as silica gel, or a combination, such as silica gel blended with zeolites. The wide range of dehumidification applications requires flexibility in selecting desiccants to minimize operating and installed costs.
In rotary desiccant dehumidifiers, more than 20 variables can affect performance. In general, equipment manufacturers fix most of these to provide predictable performance in common applications for desiccant systems. Primary variables left to the system designer to define include the following for both process and reactivation air:
In any system, these variables change because of weather, variations in moisture load, and fluctuations in reactivation energy levels. It is useful for the system designer to understand the effect of these normal variations on dehumidifier performance.
Figures 8 to 12 show changes in process air temperature and moisture leaving a generic rotary desiccant dehumidifier as modeled by a finite difference analysis program (Worek and Zheng 1991). Commercial unit performance differs from this model because such units are generally optimized for very deep drying. However, for illustration purposes, the model accurately reflects the relationships between the key variables.
The desiccant used for the model is silica gel; the bed is a structured, fluted medium; the bed depth is 16 in. in the direction of airflow; and the ratio of process air to reactivation air is approximately 3:1. Process air velocity through the desiccant bed strongly affects leaving moisture. As shown in Figure 8, if the entering moisture is 56 gr/lb and all other variables are held constant, the outlet moisture varies from 22 gr/lb at 300 fpm to 40 gr/lb at 700 fpm. Thus, air that passes through the bed more slowly is dried more deeply. Therefore, if air must be dried very deeply, a large unit (slower air velocities) must be used.
Process air inlet moisture content affects outlet moisture: if air is more humid entering the dehumidifier, it will be more humid leaving the unit. For example, Figure 9 indicates that, for an inlet humidity of 56 gr/lb, the outlet humidity is 35 gr/lb. If inlet moisture content rises to 80 gr/lb, the outlet humidity rises to 50 gr/lb. Therefore, if constant outlet humidity is necessary, the dehumidifier needs capacity control unless the process inlet airstream does not vary in temperature or moisture throughout the year (a rare circumstance).
Reactivation air inlet temperature changes the outlet moisture content of the process air. From 100 to 250°F, as more heat is added to the reactivation air, the desiccant dries more completely, which means that it can attract more moisture from the process air (see Figure 10). If reactivation air is only heated to 100°F, process outlet moisture is 50 gr/lb, or only 6 gr/lb lower than the entering humidity. In contrast, if reactivation air is heated to 200°F, the outlet moisture is 35 gr/lb, so that almost 40% of the original moisture is removed.
This relationship has two important consequences. If the design needs dry air, it is generally more economical to use high reactivation air temperatures. Conversely, if leaving humidity from the dehumidifier need not be especially low, inexpensive, low-grade heat sources (e.g., solar heat, waste heat, cogeneration heat, or rejected heat from refrigeration condensers) can be used to reactivate the desiccant.
Process air outlet temperature is higher than the inlet air temperature primarily because the heat of sorption of moisture removed from the air is converted to sensible heat. The heat of sorption includes the latent heat of condensation of the removed moisture, plus additional chemical heat, which varies depending on the desiccant type and process air outlet humidity. Also, some heat is carried over to the process air from the reactivation sector because the desiccant is warm as it enters the relatively cooler process air. Generally, 80 to 90% of the temperature rise of process air is from the heat of sorption, and the balance is from heat carried over from reactivation.
Process outlet temperature versus inlet humidity is shown in Figure 11. Note that as more moisture is removed (higher inlet humidity), outlet temperature rises. Air entering at room comfort conditions of 70°F, 56 gr/lb leaves the dehumidifier at 89°F. If the dehumidifier removes more moisture, such as when the inlet humidity is 80 gr/lb, outlet temperature rises to 94°F. The increase in temperature rise is roughly proportional to the increase in moisture removal.
Process outlet temperature versus reactivation air temperature is shown in Figure 12, which shows the effect of increasing reactivation temperature when the moisture content of the process inlet air stays constant. If the reactivation sector is heated to elevated temperatures, more moisture is removed on the process side, so the temperature rise from latent-to-sensible heat conversion is slightly greater. In this constant-moisture inlet situation, if the reactivation sector is very hot, more heat is carried from reactivation to process as the desiccant mass rotates from reactivation to process. Figure 12 shows that if reactivation air is heated to 150°F, the process air leaves the dehumidifier at 85°F. If reactivation air is heated to 250°F, the process air outlet temperature rises to 89°F. The 4°F increase in process air temperature is primarily caused by the increase in heat carried over from reactivation.
One consequence of this relationship is that desiccant equipment manufacturers constantly seek to minimize the “waste mass” in a desiccant dehumidifier, to avoid heating and cooling extra, nonfunctional material such as heavy desiccant support structures or extra desiccant that air cannot reach. Theoretically, the most efficient desiccant dehumidifier has an infinitely large effective desiccant surface combined with an infinitely low mass.
In process drying applications, desiccant dehumidifiers are sometimes used without additional cooling because the temperature increase from dehumidification helps the drying process. In semiprocess applications such as controlling frost formation in supermarkets, excess sensible cooling capacity may be present in the system as a whole, so warm air from a desiccant unit is not a major consideration. However, in most other applications for desiccant dehumidifiers, provision must be made to remove excess sensible heat from process air after dehumidification.
In a liquid-desiccant system, heat is removed by cooling the liquid desiccant itself, so process air emerges from the desiccant medium at the appropriate temperature. In a solid-desiccant system, cooling is accomplished downstream of the desiccant bed with cooling coils. The source of this cooling can affect the system’s operating economics.
In some systems, postcooling is accomplished in two stages, with cooling tower water as the primary source followed by compression or absorption cooling. Alternatively, various combinations of indirect and direct evaporative cooling equipment are used to cool the dry air leaving the desiccant unit.
In systems where the latent and sensible loads peak at different times, the sensible cooling capacity of the basic air-conditioning system is sufficient to handle the process air temperature rise without additional equipment. Systems in moderate climates with high ventilation requirements often combine high latent loads in the morning, evening, and night with high sensible loads at midday, so desiccant subsystems to handle latent loads are especially economical.